in

TEACH Program

NY Times Article

I don’t know if you’ve seen it or not, but there was a fantastic article (Student Expectations Seen as Causing Grade Disputes) in the New York Times a couple of weeks ago that I think you’ll enjoy.  At the heart of the article is the discrepancy between what students perceive to be the requirements for an A vs. what professors consider to be A material.   In addition to taking a look at the article, you should also read the comments—some are pretty heated.  I’ve included one that I think might some controversy as it discusses the possible connection between the rising sense of entitlement and the No Child Left Behind movement in K-12 schools.  Take a look and let me know what you think…I’d love to hear! 
“I agree that it's connected to the K-12 experience, where it's in the school's best interest to have grades as high as possible because of No Child Left Behind and other ranking systems. Pupils are led to believe that there's almost always an extra "bonus point" assignment to boost their grades, or that 100 percent is the normal grade in classes like gym or music. The effort to push students towards 100 percent in K-12 leads to severe disappointment when a student hits college and learns that there really are differences in ability, and that those differences are noted in the grading scheme. It's a heterogeneous world, and K-12 experience obscures that these days because it teaches students either: a)that participation and effort earn an A; or b) that bonus points will make up any discrepancies.”— djl, NY

 

Comments

No Comments
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems